The Trump shooting takes a surreal turn

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

92% : Recall this is the same doctor who, after examining Trump in 2018, gushed that Trump was (contrary to my own admittedly non-medical eyes) in "very, very good health."
48% : Naturally, being grazed by a bullet has slightly better optics favourable to Trump than, say, a shard of plastic from a teleprompter.
46% : He also confirmed that Trump can leap over tall buildings in a single bound.
44% : He also confirmed that Trump was six foot three inches in height and 239 lbs in weight.
40% : Of course, many self-styled "experts" on the internet, fresh from their recent careers as Covid-19 immunologists, dramatically display photos of AR-15 shells (not mere bullets, but full unfired cartridges) and insist that it's "impossible" that Trump could have been hit by such things.
37% : For one, Trump is doing what one must never do in such instances.
36% : I don't believe Trump's going to survive it.
35% : Trump could have, figuratively speaking anyway, laughed the whole thing off.
32% : But I don't know what that would sound like, because I've never heard Trump laugh.
19% : But Trump, who never ceases to amaze me at how truly stupid he is, doesn't know how to underplay anything.
15% : Meanwhile, FBI director Christopher Wray has raised questions about whether Trump was actually in fact hit by a bullet.
13% : "What little credibility he may have left is GONE after recklessly suggesting Trump might not have been hit from a bullet," Jackson posted.
10% : But it doesn't change the fact that Trump really was shot at, nor does it improve the fact that the candidacy of Kamala Harris has knocked Trump's assassination attempt back to page 10.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.