The US House voted to vastly expand government surveillance. The Senate must stop it | Caitlin Vogus
- Bias Rating
10% Center
- Reliability
70% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-12% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
26% Positive
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
48% : In the face of the pervasive past misuse of Section 702, the last thing Americans need is a large expansion of government surveillance.40% : In response to these and other abuses, many reformers argue that Section 702 should be reauthorized only with real reforms that would rein in government spying, such as requiring the government to get a warrant before it can access Americans' communications.
38% : Lawmakers must demand reforms to put a stop to unjustified government spying on Americans.
36% : A declassified report from 2023, for example, revealed that the FBI had used Section 702 to investigate Black Lives Matter protesters.
36% : Johnson himself initially attempted to weaken Fisa's surveillance provisions in a bid to satisfy the hardline rightwingers in his caucus and Donald Trump.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.