Upon reviewing the article, it becomes evident that it presents a biased perspective, selectively highlighting instances that support its narrative while omitting context or counterexamples. Such an approach can mislead readers and contribute to polarization. I have reported this instance on Biasly's Report Misinformation page. You can view the report here: Additionally, I commented on another user's report regarding the article "Trump allies warn Biden risking ‘World War III’ by authorizing long-range missiles for Ukraine." The original report highlighted the use of alarmist language in the article, which could incite fear among readers. I concurred with this assessment, noting that while it's essential to discuss potential risks associated with foreign policy decisions, presenting them without sufficient context can lead to unnecessary panic and hinder constructive discourse.