Daily Report
Jordan Neely Protest Takes Unexpected Turn
In general, the article does not have egregious misinformation issues, but one section that particularly stood out as problematic was the analysis of a quote from New York BLM leader Hawk Newsome in response to the not-guilty verdict for Daniel Penny. The article responded to Newsome's quote as if it was a fully direct call to violence for the black community, though it in reality is much more likely a rhetorical remark aimed at calling out what he and others believe to be hypocrisy and racism in the justice system. By not acknowledging this alternative perspective and jumping to portray Newsome and his supporters in a violent light, the author is expressing at least a minor form of bias against the BLM movement and their intentions.
Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
This is something that I think can make or break a good article even if the majority of the article is factual. The analysis of a situation or remark as it can show a person’s bias for or against …Read MoreThis is something that I think can make or break a good article even if the majority of the article is factual. The analysis of a situation or remark as it can show a person’s bias for or against something. Read Less
This type of bias is a kind I view to be some of the more effective but not in any good way. Pieces that look overall to be promising and neutral, particularly to the untrained eye. But under closer …Read MoreThis type of bias is a kind I view to be some of the more effective but not in any good way. Pieces that look overall to be promising and neutral, particularly to the untrained eye. But under closer inspection reveal there is a slight favoring to one view than the other. Read Less