The title of this article makes it clear immediately that this article is biased against Doug Emhoff, but it also reflects poorly on the women's groups that it mentions. The article instantly paints Emhoff poorly, despite him having received support from his ex-wife over the affair, as she suggests that their is more nuance to the situation than what meets the eye. Even if Mr. Emhoff had an affair, suggesting that women's groups have some sort of obligation to speak out over this makes it seem that they have done the wrong thing, or a bad thing by not speaking out.