Daily Report
Supreme Court rejects bid to restrict access to abortion pill
Why Troubling News:
This article is somewhat liberal and favors a pro-abortion stance. Throughout the article, it mentions how this sucks for anti-abortion proponents and how plaintiffs failed to show they had suffered any injury and don't have a case. It was also claimed that this decision could have caused chaos and deterred innovation, revealing its stance on the issue. The overall tone of the article depicts that the author isn't upset by the ruling and focuses on how much of a blow this was to individuals against abortion.
I agree, they even qualify the drug as “commonly used” without giving any statistics, which may prime the reader into thinking that the drug is something that may affect a larger number of people than …Read MoreI agree, they even qualify the drug as “commonly used” without giving any statistics, which may prime the reader into thinking that the drug is something that may affect a larger number of people than reality. This corroborates the opinion you stated that the author had a pro-abortion leaning. Read Less