Daily Report
The Supreme Court sure sounds eager to put Trump back on the ballot
Why Troubling News:
This article does a mediocre job at laying out the arguments placed before the Supreme Court. It is clear from the very beginning that the author is against Trump. The article repeatedly attacks Trump's lawyer and writes how he is over his head and unprepared. It discusses how the justices ripped him apart. The article rebukes the arguments made by Mitchell; however, puts in minimal effort to analyze Colorado's lawyers. They describe Trump's arguments as absurd and silly. The whole text has a negative tone towards Trump and his ability to stay on the ballot.
I could tell from the title alone that the article would be biased. It creates the impression that the Supreme Court does not care about the law at all and is a pawn of the former president. I’d still …Read MoreI could tell from the title alone that the article would be biased. It creates the impression that the Supreme Court does not care about the law at all and is a pawn of the former president. I’d still read the article but treat it with skepticism. Read Less
very much agreed.
yes, the word choice seems biased