There are several things that are concerning about this article that jump out immediately. The first thing is that the investigation of Walz's military record is already being termed a 'fiasco' for him even though there is no indication that this is the case. It shows its biases on its sleeve by referring to CNN as an 'anti-Trump network' and referrs to a 'bombshell report' from Jordan Schachtel that has no link or any other identifying information. I would not consider this a reliable source in any sense unless you are the kind of person who knows what they want from their news and you are not really interested in anything else.