The reason this article is concerning to me is that the headline tries to make it clear that he is a Chinese asset. However, the opposite is true and he does not hold any favoring views of the communist party. He has been to China but mainly to teach English and for his honeymoon which does not have any association with the ruling party in China. People who look at the headline will think that this person is an asset without reading the article and finding out what he did when he was in China.