Trump Attorneys Renew Push to Dismiss Classified Documents Charges
- Bias Rating
82% Very Conservative
- Reliability
50% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
98% Very Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-62% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-36% Negative
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
32% : Mr. Smith is prosecuting President Trump on 40 counts related to mishandling classified documents, and last month Judge Cannon held a hearing regarding two motions to dismiss counts 1-32 based on the Presidential Records Act and for constitutional vagueness.22% : They argued that both the indictment and special counsel's office in arguments have said that President Trump "caused" records to be removed from the White House, in effect conceding that he had the authority to remove them.
21% : In an April 2 court filing, the defense argued that the inability of these two laws to be reconciled in these scenarios underscored the "vagueness" of the charges against President Trump, and that they should be dropped.
20% : "As applied to President Trump, § 793(e) is unconstitutionally vague and 'no law at all,'" the defense argued.
18% : The defense, including President Trump in many public statements, had repeatedly argued that the Presidential Records Act gave President Trump the right to possess the documents he had.
12% : During the hearing, the judge pushed back on this claim, arguing that the indictment charges President Trump under the Espionage Act, making no mention of the Presidential Records Act.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.