Trump-endorsed candidate Gina Swoboda wins election as Arizona Republican Party chair
- Bias Rating
-4% Center
- Reliability
65% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-27% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
22% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
53% : "On Friday evening, Donald Trump took time during a day in which he was ordered to pay a woman $83.3 million for defamation to endorse Swoboda, the state party's third vice chair, as his preferred candidate in the internal GOP election.35% : But soon after Trump endorsed her, some political observers said Swoboda wasn't eligible to be a chair, pointing to GOP bylaws that required a chair to be an elected precinct committee member, not appointed, as Swoboda was after a move to a different legislative district.
20% : "You know, even sometimes Trump gets it wrong," said Janie Barnes of Mesa.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.