Trump Pissed Off As British Court Flushes Pee Tape Lawsuit

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

34% : Orbis Business Intelligence pronounced itself "delighted" with the High Court's decision, adding that US courts are always accusing Trump of pursuing "vexatious litigation."
32% : The Court threw the case out on the grounds that a) the dossier came to light when Buzzfeed published it in early 2017 so Trump missed the six-year statute of limitations for filing a lawsuit, and b) eh, the defendant is a whiny titty-baby who could not possibly win the suit anyway.
28% : In an impact statement he submitted to the British court last fall, Trump denied that he had "engage[d] in perverted sexual behavior including the hiring of prostitutes to engage in 'golden showers'" nor did he participate in "sex parties" in St. Petersburg, an allegation that makes us want to put our own eyes out with a pen.
26% : Trump had sued Steele's company, Orbis Business Intelligence, saying that its compilation of all that sexxxy bullshit into a handy, easy-to-download-and-leisurely-read-while-chortling .pdf file, violated Britain's data protection laws.
21% : Trump also claimed that the dossier caused him "personal and reputational damage and distress."
21% : Trump loves filing nonsense lawsuits almost as much as he ALLEGEDLY loves hiring Russian hookers to piss on him.
14% : This week the United Kingdom High Court, which is sort of like America's Supreme Court without the blatant partisanship, the off-the-charts corruption, and the dead fish levels of warmth radiated by Sam Alito, threw out a lawsuit Trump filed last year against the author of the infamous Steele Dossier, that salacious collection of raw intelligence put together by former British intelligence agent Christopher Steele that gave us such Trump-era nuggets as "Donald Trump paid Russian hookers for golden showers in a Moscow hotel room once used by Barack Obama.
10% : How much of a losing streak is gigantic loser Donald Trump on in his continuing legal fights?

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.