Trump's ex-doctor reveals near-miss bullet in health update
- Bias Rating
4% Center
- Reliability
50% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-36% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-4% Negative
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
42% : Towards the end of his statement, Jackson concluded that Trump is currently doing well.RELATED: Trump shooter Thomas Crooks reportedly teased attack in message online"He will have further evaluations, including a comprehensive hearing exam, as needed.37% : Trump hits the ground, and is escorted away from his event in Butler, PA.
21% : Jackson also confirmed that Trump received a CT scan of his head.RELATED: Trump rally shooting: What we know about the victims"The bullet track produced a 2 cm wide wound that extended down to the cartilaginous surface of the ear," the physician described.
9% : Writing a week after Trump was shot in the ear in Pennsylvania, Jackson explained that he evaluated Trump from Bedminster, New Jersey, hours after the shooting.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.