'Unbelievably bad': Legal experts debate significance of online comment on Trump jury

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

39% : And if the user knows no one who was on the jury, it's even worse," wrote legal analyst Lisa Rubin on X.ALSO READ: 'That's the Kool-Aid': Republicans triple down on Trump the morning after guilty verdict
37% : Judge Juan Merchan, who presided over former President Donald Trump's criminal conviction on 34 counts of falsifying business records, caused a stir on Friday when he notified both legal teams that the New York Court System has become aware of a response to a Facebook post from someone named "Michael Anderson" purporting to be a cousin of a juror, saying that Trump was going to be convicted.
35% : For one thing, Phang noted, there are other posts going as far back as May 20 in which the account said the same thing about Trump being convicted, which was before the jury even began deliberating, and said in a follow-up post that he and his cousin were married.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.