US Supreme Court rules against state's ban on tuition aid to religious schools

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

52% :Kelly Shackelford, president of First Liberty Institute, a law firm focused on religious freedom, commented: "We are thrilled that the Court affirmed once again that religious discrimination will not be tolerated in this country.
49% : Breyer argued that the interpretation of the First Amendment advanced by the majority opinion will work against its "general purpose," which he said is "to allow for an American society with practitioners of over 100 different religions, and those who do not practice religion at all, to live together without serious risk of religion-based social divisions."
45% : He also argued that Maine "excludes schools from its tuition program not because of the schools' religious character but because the schools will use the funds to teach and promote religious ideals.""State funding of religious activity risks the very social conflict based upon religion that the Religion Clauses were designed to prevent.
42% : Today's win helps to end anti-religious discrimination and expands sorely-needed school choice for low-income families."

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.