Was the FBI really ready to shoot Donald Trump as part of the Mar-a-Lago raid?

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

65% : Moreover, as president of the United States, Donald Trump had plenary power over all classification schemes.
57% : With this new information about the authorization for the use of deadly force and the contingency plan in case Trump and/or his Secret Service got in the way, it's just so easy to let your imagination run wild.
46% : Neither the employees of the administrative state (who work for the president and not vice versa) nor the legislature (which cannot infringe on the executive's constitutional authority) can alter the president's final say over document classification.
45% : We now know that it was the National archivists who dumped the boxes with Trump.
44% : The invaluable Julie Kelly writes:An exhibit filed today by Donald Trump in a motion to suppress evidence seized during the FBI's August 2022 raid of Mar-a-Lago revealed shocking new details about the bureau's plans to use deadly force and even engage the former president and his security detail that day if necessary.
38% : As noted above, the FBI and DOJ planned the raid for a time when they knew that Donald Trump would be away.
33% : Can't you just see some fervently partisan bureaucrat in the DOJ or the FBI fantasizing that Trump will arrive at Mar-a-Lago unexpectedly, get feisty, and be taken out by an over-zealous agent?
26% : We know that the FBI and DOJ made a point of conducting the Mar-a-Lago raid when they knew Trump would not be there.
25% : The raid and the ensuing indictment were intended to embarrass Trump, sideline him, and potentially imprison him.
17% : However, newly released documents associated with the raid empowered the FBI and DOJ agents present on the scene to shoot Donald Trump and his Secret Service detail if necessary.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.