Why Harris, Trump should both accept GSA's help for transition planning
- Bias Rating
20% Somewhat Conservative
- Reliability
70% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
44% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-12% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-10% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
68% : For this election cycle, Stier and Smith Boyd said taking advantage of GSA's resources will be especially crucial, as both Harris and Trump are already far behind where they should be on their presidential transition planning.56% : Those types of unexpected shifts are exactly why Partnership officials are urging both Harris and Trump to accept the offer of transition planning support and resources from the General Services Administration.
54% : In just the last week or so, Harris and Trump both named their transition team leads to organize and set up the policies and personnel that will step in, depending on who wins the election.
42% : "Time is running short for Harris and Trump to latch onto GSA's help.
25% : "While building the "scaffolding" of an administration, Stier said the tasks are generally the same for both Harris and Trump, but the processes will have significant differences.
6% : On the other hand, Stier said the other worst presidential transition in modern history occurred in 2016 with the move from former President Barack Obama to Trump.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.