Sun Herald Article Rating

Wisconsin AG charges 3 Donald Trump associates in fake electors case

  • Bias Rating

    52% Medium Conservative

  • Reliability

    30% ReliableFair

  • Policy Leaning

    90% Very Conservative

  • Politician Portrayal

    -31% Negative

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

-32% Negative

  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

50% : All three were working for Trump in 2020 during Trump's effort to take the state's electoral votes.
36% : While the plan was concocted in Wisconsin, it grew into a national effort between November 2020 and Jan. 6, 2021, when Trump supporters realized legal challenges to overturn vote counts state by state were failing.
15% : The fake elector's plan is one of the foundations for charges brought against Trump by special counsel Jack Smith in his Washington, D.C., case.
7% : Wisconsin is one of five states that have charged individuals for taking part in an elaborate scheme to approve fake electors for Trump in states where Biden won the vote.
6% : Chesbro is accused of hatching the plan, Troupis represented Trump in Wisconsin and Roman delivered the paperwork of fake electors to a Pennsylvania congressional staffer to hand them off to then-Vice President Mike Pence on Jan. 6.Cheseboro and Roman are named as co-conspirators in similar election cases in Arizona and Georgia.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link