With Tim Walz, Dems see a path to winning back rural districts
- Bias Rating
10% Center
- Reliability
65% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
9% Positive
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
29% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
51% : "There's a lot of support for Trump in these rural districts.41% : He clinched his last congressional race in 2016 by less than one percentage point, when Trump won the district by double digits over Hillary Clinton.
37% : It's one of 25 counties in the country that voted for Barack Obama twice before Trump flipped it red in 2016, and Biden won back in 2020.
33% : Democrats have been barely hanging on there after Biden beat Trump by a mere 106 votes in the last election.
32% : The region, where the majority of voters supported Trump in 2020, has been represented by a Republican in Congress since Walz's departure in 2018.
9% : But on a call with governors at the time of the riots, Trump told Walz he didn't blame him for the response; he blamed the Minneapolis mayor.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.